Truely "precious" content! Graphs are self-explanatory.
Yes, would like to know more about geopolitical hotspots. Out of these which in your opinion are concerning? How do compare China vs Nazi Germany in terms of its geographical ambitions?
The forthcoming article will delve deep into the hotspots. Germany was 26% of US GDP at the time of WWII. China has surpassed 60% US GDP a few years ago. The problem with geographical ambition is that Chinese military isn't battle hardened like the US, Israeli or Indian armed forces. They have to fight limited-ambition conflicts and test the mettle of their soldiers and emerge winner before they are even taken seriously by the US.
True, one more thing I can add here is, PLA's moto is to protect communist regime in China and not the nation China (it's since when it was Mao's Red Army) . So the moment they loose faith in CCP (as most of their people have already lost), PLA's moral is lost despite being equipped with deadliest weapons.
Truely "precious" content! Graphs are self-explanatory.
Yes, would like to know more about geopolitical hotspots. Out of these which in your opinion are concerning? How do compare China vs Nazi Germany in terms of its geographical ambitions?
Thanks, Sameer.
The forthcoming article will delve deep into the hotspots. Germany was 26% of US GDP at the time of WWII. China has surpassed 60% US GDP a few years ago. The problem with geographical ambition is that Chinese military isn't battle hardened like the US, Israeli or Indian armed forces. They have to fight limited-ambition conflicts and test the mettle of their soldiers and emerge winner before they are even taken seriously by the US.
True, one more thing I can add here is, PLA's moto is to protect communist regime in China and not the nation China (it's since when it was Mao's Red Army) . So the moment they loose faith in CCP (as most of their people have already lost), PLA's moral is lost despite being equipped with deadliest weapons.
Delightful read! I throughly enjoyed👍🏻